DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationMG TF
Alfa RomeoMakeMG
147ModelTF
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3Doors2

Performance

Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationMG TF
9,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
191 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower136 HP
275 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationMG TF
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/45 R16; 215/40 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alfa Romeo 147SpecificationMG TF
4170 mmLength3943 mm
1729 mmWidth1630 mm
1439 mmHeight1261 mm
1345 KgWeight1105 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…