DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi Q3 vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChevrolet
Q3ModelCaptiva
2012Model year2013
CrossoverBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
218 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
177 HPPower163 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
235/55 R17Tyre size17
YesABSNo

Dimensions

4385 mmLength4679 mm
1831 mmWidth1868 mm
1608 mmHeight1756 mm
1565 KgWeight1903 kg
—Luggage capacity447 lt
2603 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi Q3 and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…