1992 • AC
Cobra
AC Cobra 4.9 i V8 (250 Hp) 1992Overall Score81.5/100
1992 AC Cobra vs 1995 Lincoln Continental Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Lincoln
Continental
Lincoln Continental 4.6 V8 32V (279 Hp) 1995Overall Score80.75/100
WINNER
AC Cobra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.5–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC CobraSpecificationLincoln Continental
ACMakeLincoln
CobraModelContinental
1992Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
AC CobraSpecificationLincoln Continental
5,2 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed215 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
250 HPPower279 HP
407 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC CobraSpecificationLincoln Continental
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank76 lt
18 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
12 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC CobraSpecificationLincoln Continental
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/65 VR15Tyre size225/60 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
AC CobraSpecificationLincoln Continental
4115 mmLength5260 mm
1735 mmWidth1870 mm
1245 mmHeight1420 mm
980 KgWeight1745 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2770 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 AC Cobra and 1995 Lincoln Continental approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…