DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi Q3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

67.25–66.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi Q3SpecificationVolvo S80
AudiMakeVolvo
Q3ModelS80
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi Q3SpecificationVolvo S80
10,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
190 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
120 HPPower136 HP
290 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Audi Q3SpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi Q3SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi Q3SpecificationVolvo S80
4388 mmLength4854 mm
1831 mmWidth1907 mm
1608 mmHeight1493 mm
1485 KgWeight1629 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi Q3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…