DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q3 vs 2016 Citroen C3-XR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3-XR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

75.5–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeCitroen
Q3ModelC3-XR
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h—
204 km/hTop speed209 km/h
1395 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower167 HP
250 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank53 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 S tronicGears4
215/65 R16Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4388 mmLength4262 mm
1831 mmWidth1748 mm
1608 mmHeight1557 mm
1405 KgWeight1270 Kg
2603 mmWheelbase2655 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q3 and 2016 Citroen C3-XR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3-XR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…