DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Opel Frontera vs 1995 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Frontera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
FronteraModelXM
1995Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
161 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower132 HP
202 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
15 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
11,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4692 mmLength4708 mm
1764 mmWidth1794 mm
1753 mmHeight1394 mm
1803 KgWeight1395 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Opel Frontera and 1995 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Frontera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…