E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi Q2 vs 2016 KTM X-Bow Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

KTM X-Bow

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi Q2SpecificationKTM X-Bow
AudiMakeKTM
Q2ModelX-Bow
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
5Doors—

Performance

Audi Q2SpecificationKTM X-Bow
7,0 s0–100 km/h3,9 s
218 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
190 HPPower240 HP
400 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi Q2SpecificationKTM X-Bow
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Average consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi Q2SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
7 S-tronicGears6
—Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi Q2SpecificationKTM X-Bow
4191 mmLength3738 mm
1794 mmWidth1915 mm
1508 mmHeight1202 mm
—Weight790 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2430 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi Q2 and 2016 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2016 Audi Q2Borgward BX6 vs Audi Q22016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Audi Q2Borgward BX7 vs Audi Q22016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Audi Q2KTM X-Bow vs Audi Q22016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Audi Q2Lexus GS vs Audi Q22016 and 2016 model years2018 Audi A3VS2016 Audi Q2Audi A3 vs Audi Q22018 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…