DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 147

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeMitsubishi
147ModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
183 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
101 HPPower122 HP
200 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R 15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4170 mmLength4475 mm
1729 mmWidth1710 mm
1439 mmHeight1405 mm
1270 KgWeight1215 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 147 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…