2016 • Audi
Q2
Audi Q2 1.6 TDI (116 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.25/100
2016 Audi Q2 vs 2016 Skoda Rapid Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Skoda
Rapid
Skoda Rapid 1.6 TDI (115 Hp) 2016Overall Score67.5/100
WINNER
Skoda Rapid
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi Q2SpecificationSkoda Rapid
AudiMakeSkoda
Q2ModelRapid
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Audi Q2SpecificationSkoda Rapid
10,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
190 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
116 HPPower115 HP
250 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi Q2SpecificationSkoda Rapid
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption4,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Audi Q2SpecificationSkoda Rapid
4191 mmLength4483 mm
1794 mmWidth1706 mm
1508 mmHeight1461 mm
—Weight1217 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2602 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Audi Q2 and 2016 Skoda Rapid approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Rapid leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…