2004 • Opel
Corsa
Opel Corsa 1.7 CDTI (100 Hp) 2004Overall Score57.25/100
2004 Opel Corsa vs 2004 Chevrolet Tracker Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Chevrolet
Tracker
Chevrolet Tracker 1.6 i 16V 4WD (97 Hp) 2004Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Opel Corsa
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CorsaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
OpelMakeChevrolet
CorsaModelTracker
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors3
Performance
Opel CorsaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
100 HPPower97 HP
240 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CorsaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
DieselFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank56 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption14 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CorsaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/75 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CorsaSpecificationChevrolet Tracker
3839 mmLength3650 mm
1646 mmWidth1630 mm
1440 mmHeight1650 mm
1080 KgWeight1235 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Opel Corsa and 2004 Chevrolet Tracker approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Corsa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…