DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Corsa vs 2000 Holden Barina Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Holden Barina

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeHolden
CorsaModelBarina
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1389 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
114 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank46 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
165/70R 13Tyre size165/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3740 mmLength3741 mm
1610 mmWidth1608 mm
1420 mmHeight1420 mm
950 KgWeight1420 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2443 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Corsa and 2000 Holden Barina approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Holden Barina leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…