DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Corsa vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 25
OpelMakeRover
CorsaModel25
1996Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 25
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
173 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
82 HPPower84 HP
114 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CorsaSpecificationRover 25
3740 mmLength3990 mm
1610 mmWidth1688 mm
1420 mmHeight1417 mm
895 KgWeight1085 Kg
2445 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Corsa and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…