DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Opel Corsa vs 2003 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4 points.

43.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
CorsaModelClio
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

16,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
973 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
58 HPPower75 HP
85 NmTorque105 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3817 mmLength3773 mm
1646 mmWidth1639 mm
1440 mmHeight1417 mm
880 KgWeight985 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Opel Corsa and 2003 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…