2013 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 2.0 CDTI (135 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.0 SkyActiv-G (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 3
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel3
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 3
11,3 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
179 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
135 HPPower120 HP
320 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 3
4390 mmLength4460 mm
1831 mmWidth1795 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1205 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…