2002 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DTI 16V (75 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
2002 Opel Combo vs 2002 Renault Kangoo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Renault
Kangoo
Renault Kangoo 1.5 dCi (65 Hp) 2002Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points.
46.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelKangoo
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
15,5 s0–100 km/h16,3 s
155 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
75 HPPower65 HP
165 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationRenault Kangoo
4320 mmLength3995 mm
1685 mmWidth1663 mm
1800 mmHeight1827 mm
1260 KgWeight1160 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Combo and 2002 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…