DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Combo vs 2010 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3 points.

46.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
ComboModelCombo
2002Model year2010
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
155 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
165 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4322 mm
1685 mmWidth1684 mm
1800 mmHeight1801 mm
1260 KgWeight1325 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Combo and 2010 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…