DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Combo vs 2002 Fiat Palio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Palio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFiat
ComboModelPalio
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h14,4 s
155 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1698 cc
75 HPPower72 HP
165 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank48 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

4320 mmLength3735 mm
1685 mmWidth1614 mm
1800 mmHeight1445 mm
1260 KgWeight995 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Combo and 2002 Fiat Palio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Palio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…