DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Combo vs 2002 Fiat Palio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Palio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeFiat
ComboModelPalio
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
155 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1581 cc
75 HPPower87 HP
165 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank51 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABS—

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4130 mm
1685 mmWidth1626 mm
1800 mmHeight1475 mm
1260 KgWeight1080 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2423 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Combo and 2002 Fiat Palio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Palio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…