DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Opel Combo vs 2004 Volkswagen Lupo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Lupo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeVolkswagen
ComboModelLupo
2006Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
147 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1716 cc
65 HPPower60 HP
130 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank34 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4320 mmLength3527 mm
1685 mmWidth1640 mm
1800 mmHeight1460 mm
1260 KgWeight980 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2323 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Opel Combo and 2004 Volkswagen Lupo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Lupo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…