2004 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 CDTI (75 Hp) 2004Overall Score46.25/100
2004 Opel Combo vs 2004 FAW Jetta Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • FAW
Jetta
FAW Jetta 1.6 i Ci (87 Hp) 2004Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
FAW Jetta
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationFAW Jetta
OpelMakeFAW
ComboModelJetta
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationFAW Jetta
15,5 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
155 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
75 HPPower87 HP
165 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationFAW Jetta
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationFAW Jetta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationFAW Jetta
4322 mmLength4385 mm
1684 mmWidth1674 mm
1801 mmHeight1415 mm
1205 KgWeight1060 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2471 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Opel Combo and 2004 FAW Jetta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, FAW Jetta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…