DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Opel Combo vs 2004 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
ComboModelXsara
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
155 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
75 HPPower90 HP
165 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank54 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength4167 mm
1684 mmWidth1698 mm
1801 mmHeight1405 mm
1205 KgWeight1020 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Opel Combo and 2004 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…