DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Opel Combo vs 2004 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

42.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeCitroen
ComboModelSaxo
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

18,5 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
147 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
65 HPPower57 HP
130 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength3718 mm
1684 mmWidth1595 mm
1801 mmHeight1368 mm
1205 KgWeight890 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Opel Combo and 2004 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…