DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Opel Combo vs 2010 Brilliance M2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeBrilliance
ComboModelM2
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
170 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank74 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
185/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4322 mmLength4648 mm
1684 mmWidth1800 mm
1801 mmHeight1450 mm
1295 KgWeight1455 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Opel Combo and 2010 Brilliance M2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…