DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Opel Combo vs 2010 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11 points.

60.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
ComboModelCombo
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
170 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
100 HPPower75 HP
240 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,2 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength4322 mm
1684 mmWidth1684 mm
1801 mmHeight1801 mm
1295 KgWeight1278 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Opel Combo and 2010 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…