DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Opel Combo vs 2017 Proton Iriz Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Proton Iriz

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeProton
ComboModelIriz
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
158 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
290 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength3920 mm
1831 mmWidth1722 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1554 mm
—Weight1150-1165 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2555 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Opel Combo and 2017 Proton Iriz approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Proton Iriz leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…