DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Combo vs 2011 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelTrafic
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
158 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
290 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank90 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4782 mm
1831 mmWidth1904 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1955 mm
—Weight1650 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Combo and 2011 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…