DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Opel Combo vs 2017 Mitsubishi Xpander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
ComboModelXpander
2017Model year2017
MinivanBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h—
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
290 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4475 mm
1831 mmWidth1750 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1695 mm
—Weight1780 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Opel Combo and 2017 Mitsubishi Xpander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…