2013 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score60.25/100
2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T2 (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationVolvo V40
OpelMakeVolvo
ComboModelV40
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationVolvo V40
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
206 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationVolvo V40
Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption6,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationVolvo V40
4390 mmLength4369 mm
1831 mmWidth1783 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1420 mm
—Weight1463 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2647 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…