DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationHonda FIT
OpelMakeHonda
ComboModelFIT
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationHonda FIT
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
120 HPPower110 HP
206 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationHonda FIT
Petrol / CNGFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
60 ltFuel tank32 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationHonda FIT
4390 mmLength3955 mm
1831 mmWidth1695 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1525 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…