2013 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.4 CNG (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score60.25/100
2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Honda CR-Z Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Honda
CR-Z
Honda CR-Z 1.5 i-VTEC (114Hp) 2013Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Opel Combo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationHonda CR-Z
OpelMakeHonda
ComboModelCR-Z
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationHonda CR-Z
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
172 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
206 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationHonda CR-Z
Petrol / CNGFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank40 lt
—Urban consumption6,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationHonda CR-Z
4390 mmLength4078 mm
1831 mmWidth2013 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1395 mm
—Weight1147 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2435 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…