DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeRenault
147ModelScenic
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
206 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower163 HP
305 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4170 mmLength4259 mm
1729 mmWidth1810 mm
1439 mmHeight1620 mm
1275 KgWeight—
2546 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…