DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Opel Combo vs 2013 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

46.25–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelKangoo
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeMinivan
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h19,6 s
161 km/hTop speed146 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
95 HPPower68 HP
127 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4390 mmLength4213 mm
1831 mmWidth1829 mm
1845-2100 mmHeight1839 mm
—Weight1464 Kg
2755 mmWheelbase2697 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Opel Combo and 2013 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…