DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Opel Combo vs 2000 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelScenic
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
2Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
113 NmTorque112 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R14 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4230 mmLength4168 mm
1686 mmWidth1719 mm
1805 mmHeight1609 mm
—Weight1105 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Opel Combo and 2000 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…