DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Opel Combo vs 1993 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationGeo Storm
OpelMakeGeo
ComboModelStorm
1994Model year1993
Pick-upBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
3Doors2

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1389 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
82 HPPower130 HP
113 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationGeo Storm
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationGeo Storm
4230 mmLength4150 mm
1686 mmWidth1695 mm
1805 mmHeight1300 mm
—Weight1010 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Opel Combo and 1993 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…