DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Opel Combo vs 2009 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
ComboModelClio
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
152 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1149 cc
75 HPPower75 HP
170 NmTorque107 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size165/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength4027 mm
1684 mmWidth2025 mm
1801 mmHeight1497 mm
1278 KgWeight1090 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2575 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Opel Combo and 2009 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…