DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Combo vs 2011 Nissan Pixo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pixo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
ComboModelPixo
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
150 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement996 cc
70 HPPower68 HP
170 NmTorque90 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,5 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size55/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4322 mmLength3565 mm
1684 mmWidth1600 mm
1801 mmHeight1470 mm
1325 KgWeight885 Kg
2716 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Combo and 2011 Nissan Pixo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pixo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…