DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Opel Combo vs 2000 ZAZ 1102 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

ZAZ 1102

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1102
OpelMakeZAZ
ComboModel1102
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1102
0 km/hTop speed148 km/h
1195 ccEngine displacement1091 cc
45 HPPower53 HP
88 NmTorque80 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1102
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank39 lt
—Average consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1102
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size155/70 R13S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationZAZ 1102
4230 mmLength3708 mm
1686 mmWidth1554 mm
1805 mmHeight1410 mm
1065 KgWeight727 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2320 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Opel Combo and 2000 ZAZ 1102 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, ZAZ 1102 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…