DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Opel Cascada vs 2015 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeOpel
CascadaModelAntara
2015Model year2015
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
212 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement2231 cc
165 HPPower184 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank65 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4596 mm
1839 mmWidth1850 mm
1443 mmHeight1761 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight—
2695 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Opel Cascada and 2015 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…