DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Opel Cascada vs 2015 Mini Clubman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Clubman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMini
CascadaModelClubman
2015Model year2015
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
212 km/hTop speed228 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower192 HP
350 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4253 mm
1839 mmWidth1800 mm
1443 mmHeight1441 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1360 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Opel Cascada and 2015 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Clubman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…