DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Opel Cascada vs 2014 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSaab
CascadaModel9-3
2014Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
212 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
165 HPPower175 HP
350 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4635 mm
1839 mmWidth1762 mm
1443 mmHeight1466 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1440 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Opel Cascada and 2014 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…