DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Cascada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeVolkswagen
CascadaModelPolo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h6,7 s
235 km/hTop speed236 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
200 HPPower192 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength3983 mm
1839 mmWidth1682 mm
1443 mmHeight1450 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1197 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Cascada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…