DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Proton Suprima S Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Proton Suprima S

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeProton
CascadaModelSuprima S
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
207 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1561 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
200 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 ProTronic
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4436 mm
1839 mmWidth1786 mm
1443 mmHeight1524 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1365-1395 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Proton Suprima S approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Proton Suprima S leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…