DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Opel Cascada vs 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeAlfa Romeo
CascadaModelMiTo
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats4/5
2Doors3

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
207 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1362 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
140 HPPower120 HP
200 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
56 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4696 mmLength4063 mm
1839 mmWidth1720 mm
1443 mmHeight1446 mm
1701-1816 KgWeight1145/1197 Kg
2695 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Opel Cascada and 2016 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…