2000 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 3.1 TD (109 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
2000 Opel Campo vs 1999 Holden Jackaroo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Holden
Jackaroo
Holden Jackaroo 3.1 TD 4X4 (3 dr) 1999Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Opel Campo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationHolden Jackaroo
OpelMakeHolden
CampoModelJackaroo
2000Model year1999
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationHolden Jackaroo
16,9 s0–100 km/h16,6 s
155 km/hTop speed150 km/h
3059 ccEngine displacement3059 cc
109 HPPower114 HP
255 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationHolden Jackaroo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank85 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationHolden Jackaroo
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationHolden Jackaroo
4980 mmLength4270 mm
1690 mmWidth1745 mm
1710 mmHeight1835 mm
—Weight1900 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Opel Campo and 1999 Holden Jackaroo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Campo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…