1999 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 3.1 TD (109 Hp) 1999Overall Score52.25/100
1999 Opel Campo vs 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Pajero
Mitsubishi Pajero 2.8 TD GLX (125 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Pajero
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
OpelMakeMitsubishi
CampoModelPajero
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
16,9 s0–100 km/h17,3 s
155 km/hTop speed150 km/h
3059 ccEngine displacement2835 cc
109 HPPower125 HP
255 NmTorque292 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank92 lt
—Urban consumption15,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,7 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption12,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel CampoSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15 R
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationMitsubishi Pajero
4980 mmLength4700 mm
1690 mmWidth1695 mm
1710 mmHeight1855 mm
—Weight2129 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Opel Campo and 2000 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…