1996 • Opel
Campo
Opel Campo 3.1 TD (109 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Opel Campo vs 2000 Daewoo Musso Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Daewoo
Musso
Daewoo Musso 2.9 TD (129 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Daewoo Musso
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel CampoSpecificationDaewoo Musso
OpelMakeDaewoo
CampoModelMusso
1996Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel CampoSpecificationDaewoo Musso
16,9 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
155 km/hTop speed160 km/h
3059 ccEngine displacement2874 cc
109 HPPower129 HP
255 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Opel CampoSpecificationDaewoo Musso
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption12 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
12,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Opel CampoSpecificationDaewoo Musso
4980 mmLength4640 mm
1690 mmWidth1864 mm
1710 mmHeight1735 mm
—Weight1850 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2630 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Opel Campo and 2000 Daewoo Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Daewoo Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…