DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Campo vs 2000 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
OpelMakeGAZ
CampoModel31
1997Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
23,4 s0–100 km/h22,0 s
140 km/hTop speed140 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
76 HPPower81 HP
160 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CampoSpecificationGAZ 31
4980 mmLength4960 mm
1690 mmWidth1800 mm
1710 mmHeight1422 mm
—Weight1540 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Campo and 2000 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…