DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Campo vs 2000 Daewoo Korando Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Daewoo Korando

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeDaewoo
CampoModelKorando
1996Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

23,4 s0–100 km/h25,0 s
140 km/hTop speed125 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
76 HPPower80 HP
160 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4980 mmLength4260 mm
1690 mmWidth1841 mm
1710 mmHeight1840 mm
—Weight1750 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2480 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Campo and 2000 Daewoo Korando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Daewoo Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…