DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Campo vs 1996 Mazda MPV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MPV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel CampoSpecificationMazda MPV
OpelMakeMazda
CampoModelMPV
1996Model year1996
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors4

Performance

Opel CampoSpecificationMazda MPV
—0–100 km/h16,4 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
98 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque277 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel CampoSpecificationMazda MPV
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel CampoSpecificationMazda MPV
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel CampoSpecificationMazda MPV
4980 mmLength4670 mm
1690 mmWidth1825 mm
1710 mmHeight1750 mm
—Weight1775 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Campo and 1996 Mazda MPV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MPV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…