DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Opel Campo vs 2000 SsangYong Musso Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Musso

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

39.5–40.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeSsangYong
CampoModelMusso
1999Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

23,1 s0–100 km/h23,5 s
135 km/hTop speed135 km/h
2255 ccEngine displacement2299 cc
94 HPPower80 HP
170 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4980 mmLength4630 mm
1690 mmWidth1905 mm
1710 mmHeight1735 mm
—Weight17960 Kg
3025 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Opel Campo and 2000 SsangYong Musso approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Musso leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…